Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Unsorted results

Indicators and templates (v · e)
Case decisions:
These indicators are used by Checkusers, SPI clerks and other patrolling users, to allow easier at-a-glance reading of their notes, actions and comments.
IP blocked {{IPblock}}	Tagged {{Stagged}}
Blocked but awaiting tags {{Sblock}}	Not possible {{Impossible}}
Blocked and tagged {{Blockedandtagged}}	Blocked without tags {{Blockedwithouttags}}
No tags {{No tags}}	Blocked and tagged. Closing. {{Blockedtaggedclosing}}
Information:
Additional information needed {{MoreInfo}}	Deferred {{Deferred}}
Note: {{TakeNote}}	In progress {{Inprogress}}
Clerk actions:
Clerk assistance requested: {{Clerk Request}}	Clerk note: {{Clerk-Note}}
Delisted {{Delisted}}	Relisted {{Relisted}}
Clerk declined {{Decline}}	Clerk endorsed {{Endorse}}
Self-endorsed by clerk for checkuser attention {{Selfendorse}}	CheckUser requested {{CURequest}}
Specific to CheckUser:
Confirmed {{Confirmed}}	Unrelated {{Unrelated}}
Confirmed with respect to the named user(s). No comment with respect to IP address(es). {{Confirmed-nc}}
Technically indistinguishable {{Technically indistinguishable}}
Likely {{Likely}}	Unlikely {{Unlikely}}
Possible {{Possible}}	Inconclusive {{Inconclusive}}
Declined {{Declined}}	Unnecessary {{Unnecessary}}
Stale (too old) {{StaleIP}}	No comment {{Nocomment}}
CheckUser is not a crystal ball {{Crystalball}}	CheckUser is not for fishing {{Fishing}}
CheckUser is not magic pixie dust {{Pixiedust}}	The CheckUser Magic 8-Ball says: {{8ball}}
Endorsed by a checkuser {{Cu-endorsed}}	Check declined by a checkuser {{Cudecline}}
Possilikely (a mix between possible and likely) {{possilikely}}

Shortcut: WP:RFCU/SORT

Please do not make requests here.

This page is intended as a Noticeboard for checkuser results that have been made public, but were not the result of a request at Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser. This page is not for requesting checks; such requests will be deleted. Requests belong on RfCU, this is only to gather results made public in a forum other than RfCU.

Checkusers: Please feel free to just post a copy of your report. The indicators on the right may be helpful. A clerk will see that the result is properly archived.

Non-checkusers: If you have noticed a checkuser posting a result on a page other than RfCU, please note it below. Please provide the diff where the checkuser posted the result. If the result was not posted by a checkuser, please provide as much information as possible to allow us to follow up and find the original checkuser's report.

Results left here will be sorted into a case page based upon existing case names or the indicated primary username.

Results from those with checkuser

Results noted from elsewhere

Ramand/TheftByEating sock drawer

Upon investigating the recent edit war at Grigori Perelman, I uncovered many accounts using the same IPs, editing the same articles in the same way, and doing so in such a way as to avoid any one account violating WP:3RR. As such, along with blocking the other legitimate editors who had violated 3RR, I also blocked Ramand and TheftByEating, the two members of the sock drawer who were reverting there, indefinitely, while leaving the rest aone for the moment. Since then, Daborhe, anothe ro the accounts that is very likely the same person, began reverting at Grigori Perelman. As such, and especially since I can't find any with more than a few dozen edits, mostly trolling and warring, I'm outing them all here and blocking them. The accounts include:

Taken togeher, they have violated 3RR on many articles, including Grigori Perelman, Military use of children, World War II, and other WWII-related articles. Dmcdevit·t 22:16, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Add 200YearsOld now. It would be nice to get some more people watching Grigori Perelman. Dmcdevit·t 23:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk note: Cross-posted from ANI, needs diffs and /Case formatting. Thatcher131 (talk) 13:26, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]