Jump to content

Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Morphh

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Mathbot (talk | contribs) at 20:00, 1 September 2006 (Add link to edit summary usage for Morphh). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Voice your opinion! Ending 19:35, 8 September 2006 (UTC)

Morphh (talk · contribs) – I've been an editor on Wikipedia for over a year and feel I have learned enough to lead. I do many repetitive tasks on project contributions (Stargate Wikiproject, WikiProject Biography, WikiProject Comics, & WikiProject North Carolina) that would benifit from Administrive rights and associated Wikipedia tools. Morphh 19:35, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here: I Accept - Self Nomination Morphh 19:55, 1 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Questions for the candidate

Dear candidate, thank you for offering to serve Wikipedia in this capacity. Please take the time to answer a few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? Please check out Category:Wikipedia backlog, and read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.
A: I would consider working on Articles to be merged, NPOV disputes, Articles with unsourced quotes, Articles with unsourced statements, Category needed, & Needs infobox
2. Of your articles or contributions to Wikipedia, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A: FairTax - I've done a lot of work to this article and succesfully worked through many disputes. While it still needs some work in regard to third party references and prose, I hope to get it to FA status soon.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A: Followed Wikipedia guidelines for conflict resolution. I would deal with in the same in the future - they work well.
Comments

Current tally: (0/0/0)
Support
Oppose
Neutral