Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/FASTLANE(Zootopia)

FASTLANE(Zootopia)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This looks to be a non-notable fanfiction. I like the author's creativity, but I just don't see where this would pass WP:NBOOK. Most fanfiction never gets to the level of notability needed to pass that criteria without being published ala Fifty Shades. Even one of the most infamous fanfiction works out there, My Immortal, doesn't qualify for its own article and that's kind of a household name in the fanfic communities. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:31, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'd have A7'd this, except that I'm not sure that works of fiction like this would qualify even if they were uploaded to the Internet. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:34, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: looks like My Immortal finally got its own article. When I'd last seen the article in 2013 it was a redirect, so you can kind of understand why it's so difficult to establish notability on Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:13, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 16:22, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No independent sources have been provided. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 01:42, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG Self-published fan fiction. No independent coverage, and highly doubtful there ever will be any based on the original work I found here https://www.fanfiction.net/s/12042566/1/FASTLANE-Zootopia. I'm also not sure if A7 web content applies either. Meters (talk) 03:56, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just speedy delete it. It someone's fan fiction, 'nuff said editorEهեইдအ😎 05:53, 24 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]