Talk:Open-source software security

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Software: Computing Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing.

This page was intended to display the pros and cons of open source security from an unbiased view. There is plenty of info that needs to be added to the pros and cons. Also, more metrics and measures need to be added along with other baselines.

The three reasons given as cons to using an Open Source security model all seem to me to be the same reason....many people USING the software doesn't guarantee that many people are improving it. Can't we merge these "three" reasons somehow? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.183.66.175 (talk) 05:01, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move

Open source software security → Open-source software security — like Open-source software — Neustradamus (✉) 18:26, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion moved to Talk:List of free and open source software packages#Requested move. Jafeluv (talk) 16:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That discussion was closed no concensus after 34 days Anthony Appleyard (talk) 11:31, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]