User talk:Widr

This is Widr's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73: 3 days

RevDelete Request

Is it allowed to RevDelete the edit summary used here? Peter Sam Fan 22:45, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nah, just ignore it. Widr (talk) 04:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Sony200Sony

You may want to revoke talk page access.--Cahk (talk) 16:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Issues with User:Muhammad Umair Mirza putting in unsourced dates into articles

@Favonian: @Alexis Ivanov:In late March, you were involved in placing a 31 hour block on User:Muhammad Umair Mirza because that person has added unsubstantiated detailed dates to a large number of Wikipedia articles, particularly those articles dealing with the early days of Islam and the caliphate. He is still doing this. Despite requests and comments from a number of other users, including myself, seeking some explanation from him as to where he is getting his "accurate" information about the dates that certain events, dates of birth and death and the like occurred, he has not responded. I have looked at his talk page and I see no evidence that he responds to people who raise concerns with him. I note he never responded to your decision to put the 31 hour block on him. Nor has he responded to Favonian's warnings. Given that he is active again at the moment, I would appreciate your assistance. Thank you--Chewings72 (talk) 10:34, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked the user again, since talking to them seems to have had no effect. Widr (talk) 10:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you.--Chewings72 (talk) 11:10, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

IP: 216.15.21.210

Keeps being disruptive via their talk page. Feinoha ^Talk 20:34, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2 requests

Please revoke talk page access for user:176.92.139.62. 2602:306:3357:BA0:D123:DF0:F8CF:38DC (talk) 03:12, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No. They are free to blank their own talk page. Stop edit warring. Widr (talk) 03:16, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duduk

My changes on duduk are not vandalism. They are using the correct name for the instrument. They changes have been reverted. HyeSK (talk) 15:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC)HyeSK[reply]

You need to discuss such changes on the article's talk page and gain consensus first. Widr (talk) 15:35, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User 71.35.148.141 is back as User:Libanguled

User 71.35.148.141 who is banned is back as User:Libanguled. He/She continues to make unconstructive in Galmudug and Galkayo pages changes. Can you please look it up? Thank you. "Dhinawda (talk) 08:59, 20 June 2016 (UTC)";Dhinawda[reply]

It seems both of you are edit warring again, this time using your registered accounts. Please discuss on the article's talk pages instead. Widr (talk) 09:20, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Double Page

I have recently put an A7 tag on Third war of panipat:story of the captured maratha POWs. However, the user then copy-pasted the article into draft space and made some changes ( Draft:Third war of panipat:story of the captured maratha POWs ). Does this qualify for a histmerge onto the draft and deletion of the article space page? Also, in both pages he added a 10,000 bytes edit, which seemed a bit suspicious of a copyvio, even though nothing showed up in Earwig's tool. Cheers, Dat Guy^Talk_Contribs 11:01, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll pass this. I have no idea of anything related to histmerges. Sorry. Widr (talk) 11:36, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]