This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Widefox(talk | contribs) at 13:20, 19 June 2016(Assessment: +Linux: class=Stub, importance=Mid; +Computing: class=Stub, importance=Low, software=y, software-importance=Mid (assisted)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.Revision as of 13:20, 19 June 2016 by Widefox(talk | contribs)(Assessment: +Linux: class=Stub, importance=Mid; +Computing: class=Stub, importance=Low, software=y, software-importance=Mid (assisted))
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles relating to Microsoft on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linux, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Linux on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinuxWikipedia:WikiProject LinuxTemplate:WikiProject LinuxLinux
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Why is there "Ubuntu binaries" and "Ubuntu user-mode", not "GNU user-mode"? Ubuntu is just a distribution. GNU is the userland and tools.
94.254.177.22 (talk) 15:07, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Because they're running binaries direct from the Ubuntu distribution, not source code compiled to run on Windows Subsystem for Linux. The GNU project don't, as far as I know, distribute binaries, they just distribute source.
The irony of this "No it's GNU."/"No it's Ubuntu." argument is that neither is correct. Yesterday, Seth Jennings, a Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat, demonstrated Fedora binaries, taken from a Docker image, running on the subsystem. If there's a name for what binaries run here, it is Linux binaries, i.e. binaries that make Linux system calls to (what they expect to be) a Linux kernel. This is the name used by FreeBSD writers and Solaris/Illumos writers. It's also the name used in the Wikipedia lxrun article.
There's "what binaries can WSL run?" and there's "what binaries does Microsoft ship?" The answer to the former is probably "Linux binaries"; the answer to the latter is "Ubuntu binaries". Guy Harris (talk) 20:56, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
An introduction that explains why this is useful might be nice.
I.e., what was the business model? Who is the user? Why would this be their preferred solution? Without that, this seems like a strange hybrid of two divergent worlds. MrRedwood (talk) 22:24, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]