Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Project Syndicate
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is the current revision of this page, as edited by Hankwang (talk | contribs) at 13:21, 27 August 2006 (missing closing div tag). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this version.Revision as of 13:21, 27 August 2006 by Hankwang (talk | contribs) (missing closing div tag)
(diff) ← Previous revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Stubbleboy 09:24, 27 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
[This is a copy and paste job from the subject's web page. I probably should have just speedied the thing. The subject seemed notable, so I gave the creator the opportunity to fix it. Creator followed my advice on changing to the third person, but there has been no substantial rewrite. It is either a copyvio or self-promoting spam. :) Dlohcierekim 13:07, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete ST47 13:27, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as copyvio and/or self-promoting spam. --Ezeu 23:54, 19 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Changing to keep as the article has been rewritten to remove the copyvio problem. They are certainly notable as they even turn up some recent google news articles. --Ezeu 06:31, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
*Delete per nom. I will abstain as the article is no longer a copyvio, however it still will need a cleanup. Stubbleboy 14:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It isn't a copyvio any longer. I added external links. I think the article is better now. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 05:36, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Good job on the rewrite. It is too good for a speedy. No longer a copyvio. Does it meet inclusion criteria? :) Dlohcierekim 09:58, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment. http://www.voltairenet.org/article135044.html offers some third-party coverage of Project Syndicate, as do the other references. Google News carries a number of Project Syndicate articles at http://news.google.com/news?q=%22Project+Syndicate%22 , and so does http://news.yahoo.com TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 10:28, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per Ezeu. wikipediatrix 16:05, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as per Ezeu. with thanks to User:TruthbringerToronto for the rewrite. :) Dlohcierekim 22:22, 20 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]