Talk:Boadicea-class cruiser

Boadicea-class cruiser has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 2, 2016.

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips

Military history

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Additional information:
/
	This article is not currently associated with a task force. To tag it for one or more task forces, please add the task force codes from the template instructions to the template call.

((WikiProject Wales

}}

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Boadicea-class cruiser/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Parsecboy (talk · contribs) 11:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'll take this one as well. Parsecboy (talk) 11:59, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

One dupe link
Image checks out
The 4-inch gun is not converted into metric like the other weapons
Watch ENGVAR - I see a "maximize"
Something's wrong with the table - Boadicea doesn't have a builder listed.
The line about Jutland seems to be out of chronological order. Parsecboy (talk) 12:06, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I was trying to put all the combat-related stuff in the same paragraph, but I agree with you and don't think that it worked. All fixed, see if they work for you.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:01, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]