Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AtScript

AtScript

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability: article about a proposed programming language for a specific JavaScript framework that (proposal) lasted for a few month and (language) never happened Dchestnykh (talk) 22:32, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. /wiae /tlk 23:56, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, NN. –Be..anyone 💩 08:27, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:JUSTAVOTE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as none of this suggests better notability improvements. SwisterTwister talk 06:02, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:NEXIST, "notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article". North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I searched for coverage and found: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6]. None of the other !votes here seem to show any evidence of looking for coverage, and no attempt at an evidence/policy-based argument to back up their opinions. --Michig (talk) 06:38, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep – Meets WP:GNG, per some of the sources I was able to access posted by Michig above. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:17, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:02, 30 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A very lazy Google search picks up no shortage of coverage spanning some time. Michig posted some. I found an extra one in French. I've done some improvements to the article to include material from these sources. Happy Squirrel (talk) 01:50, 3 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]