Category talk:Volcanoes of Java

Could we talk about the way to go with this? SatuSuro 12:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

he he - have you checked the article recently? Volcanoes of Java Look - this is just the start. I've combined the two pages the way i suggested - but of course, the info is still the same old s#@$. Yes, now we could work on getting that info in. ie, the suggestions both of us have made. I don't know about you, but my style is to "have a bash" and get something just 1/2 decent, or even less, and then throw it on the table for all to work on. Merbabu 12:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

hmm - i think my idea was not to write a list but rely on linking this category to individual volcano articles. Ie, an auto list. But yes, the catch with that is, it of course relies on each mountain having an article. But that is not impossible - the important mountains already do, and stubs need only be 2 sentences. Merbabu 12:28, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PS, i really want to get rid of all that other text. I am reluctant to delete it, in case we can get something out of it, but that is too much effort. lol. THe alternative is to dump it into the individual articles, but that just moves the problem. hmm - i will think about it. Merbabu 12:30, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

PPS: OK - i can see you edits. hmm - i see. yes, that can work. Good info. we can run with that. i will work on the intro Merbabu 12:31, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Don't put too many volcanoes in that list!!! I'd like to create article for each one. lol Merbabu 12:42, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It seems a bit counter productive with edit conflicts - I would have liked to have finished cleaning up:) SatuSuro 12:50, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

lol - i know. but it was kinda funny so i kept going. i think we seem to be on a parellel path anyway. close enough. Merbabu 12:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It dosnt look that forboding now - surely? SatuSuro 12:55, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Positive? I think you have to balance that with the negative. NPOV would compare the negative and positive benefits on sitting on top of the Java Trench subduction zone- or sitting plonk in the middle of the Sunda arc :) SatuSuro 13:12, 24 August 2006 (UTC) Geeze ya gotta be careful - som dimwit has put Sunda Plate when it should be arc :( SatuSuro 13:14, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sandboxes

Maybe you need educating? :) SatuSuro 13:19, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It may be encyclopedic editing but I am in the mood to do it on he wild side tonight - someone said something about being bold. Merbabu 13:21, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

every time, as they used to say ;SatuSuro 13:23, 24 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]