Jump to content

Talk:High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Cyberbot II (talk | contribs) at 08:56, 29 March 2016 (Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputing Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Time for a Hanging

Whoever though up this way to force poor resolutions on people should be found guilty of crimes against humanity and put to death. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.171.24.179 (talk) 22:44, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Supported. Urbanus Secundus (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Removal through internal hardware bus

Anyone see that HDCP can be removed by bad security inside devices? http://sites.google.com/site/hdcontentsecurity/

References


I think the author mixed up a lot and refers to http://blog.cryptographyengineering.com/2012/08/reposted-cryptanalysis-of-hdcp-v2.html 80.246.32.33 (talk) 07:56, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

HDCP v2.1 and v2.0 Breach

This section makes no sense and grammar is way off, anyone know what it is supposed to say and can fix it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:2:4600:79A:385D:461A:487D:7FB1 (talk) 17:10, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on High-bandwidth Digital Content Protection. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:56, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]