Jump to content

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unbuttered Parsnip

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Vanjagenije (talk | contribs) at 20:07, 7 March 2016 (Comment). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

Unbuttered Parsnip

Unbuttered Parsnip (talk+ · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log· investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Unbuttered Parsnip/Archive.



06 March 2016

– A checkuser has declined a request for CheckUser, and the case is now awaiting a behavioural investigation.

Suspected sockpuppets

unexplained removal of sourced content. user has been using the IP 194.75.238.182 as a sockpuppet. please investigate again. thank you.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Naga,_Cebu&diff=prev&oldid=708574530 HavenHost (talk) 10:13, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Comment from insufferable SPI stalker: CU will not be typically used to connect named accounts with IPs. GABHello! 14:37, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

  • I've declined the CU request. We rarely publicly disclose the IP(s) of named accounts.--Bbb23 (talk) 18:11, 6 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • @HavenHost:  Additional information needed. In order to facilitate and expedite your request, please provide diffs to support your case. Please give two or more diffs meeting the following format:
  1. At least one diff is from the sockmaster (or an account already blocked as a confirmed sockpuppet of the sockmaster), showing the behaviour characteristic of the sockmaster.
  2. At least one diff per suspected sockpuppet, showing the suspected sockpuppet emulating the behaviour of the sockmaster given in the first diff.
  3. In situations where it is not immediately obvious from the diffs what the characteristic behaviour is, a short explanation must be provided. Around one sentence is enough for this. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]