Talk:Common Address Redundancy Protocol

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Citation Necessary?

Can someone provide a citation to support this sentence?:

 Because VRRP fixed problems with the HSRP protocol, Cisco began using VRRP instead, while still claiming it as its own.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 164.67.97.133 (talk) 02:44, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Strong bias in history section

This section is poorly worded, lopsided and contains several statements of either a speculative nature, or else which need to be backed up by appropriate citations.

Because VRRP fixed problems with the HSRP protocol^{[citation needed]}
Cisco informed the OpenBSD developers they would enforce their patent of HSRP^{[citation needed]}
This may have been related to their lawsuit with Alcatel^{[speculation?]}
as the "reasonable and non-discriminatory" licensing terms necessarily excluded open-source implementations^{[citation needed]}
To avoid infringing the HSRP patent, they ensured their idea for CARP was fundamentally different^{[citation needed]}
and is designed to use cryptography^{[citation needed]}

2001:4D68:2002:100:0:0:0:110 (talk) 23:06, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cisco Copyright infringement

This might help in the section above (Strong bias in history section). It is related to Cisco's patent claims on HSRP / VRRP.

https://www.ietf.org/ietf-ftp/IPR//VRRP-CISCO

https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/19/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.253.195.17 (talk) 22:45, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]