Talk:Windows Server
![]() | Computing: Software Stub‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
Windows 2000
Did Microsoft really ever refer to Windows 2000 Server as Windows Server? Josh 20:26, 13 August 2007 (UTC)
the "Windows Server" brand came out tin 2003 with the introduction of windows server 2003. however seing as hough NT 4 is listed here it should be included. --Charles E. Keisler (talk), Network+ 17:53, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Windows NT Server
Why is Windows NT Server not listed in this article? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.185.50.124 (talk • contribs) 10:29, 22 March 2014 (UTC
- There's no such thing as "Windows NT Server". The article now mentions NT 3.1 Advanced Server, NT 3.5 Server, NT 4.0 Server, and W2K Server, although they didn't use the "Windows Server" brand, they just used brands that had both "Windows" and "Server" in them, but not consecutively. Guy Harris (talk) 20:05, 19 July 2015 (UTC)
Windows MultiPoint Server 2010
Paul Thurott depicted this as another Windows Server line: Windows MultiPoint Server 2010-Supersite Blog
And indeed, it does use Windows Server CALs. Can someone contribute because I'm on the fence on whether it's really Windows Server. Jasper Deng (talk) 06:30, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
Change to category?
This is more like a category rather than an article.Jasper Deng (talk) 03:17, 20 February 2011 (UTC)
- No. We already do have a category. If it looks like a category to you, it sure doesn't looks so to a person who looks for actual information and searches "Windows Server". It is a stub and should remain a stub. Fleet Command (talk) 12:24, 8 May 2011 (UTC)
Windows Home Server
It seems implicit that Windows Home Server is not part of the Windows Server brand, yet a clear proof of the distinction would be appreciated