Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooperative clustering
Appearance
- Cooperative clustering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Lack of Notability. This tiny subtopic of cluster analysis appears to be only followed by a single author, cited 30 times including false positives. Most matches of "cooperative clustering" refer to very other methods - search for "Cooperative-Based Clustering" "Cooperative-Based+Clustering" Google Scholar to fully see the obscurity of this topic. All in all, not a lot of independent coverage: "Cooperative+Clustering"+Kamel Google Scholar except self-cites by Kashef and Kamel.
The article had been created to support Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cooperative-based graph clustering which has already been deleted because of lacking notability. HelpUsStopSpam (talk) 23:24, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:32, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —UY Scuti Talk 19:41, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
- delete: not notable. --Chire (talk) 14:47, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- Delte at best for now as this is questionable for the applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 05:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)