Talk:Common Core implementation by state

Bias

I'm sensing quite a bit of negative bias against Common Core in some of these state portraits, as well as some inaccuracies introduced by seemingly careless phrasing. Adding to my list...- Sara FB (talk) 04:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I am terribly behind on updating this, haven't had a lot of time. If there are specific details you believe are being missed, please share them. Thargor Orlando (talk) 11:47, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Updating and ref'ing

What started as a little fact-checking is turning into a full-blown update of everything. I'm going through each state and finding references on state DOE websites for the info; also adding assessment consortium information where relevant. I'm doing it state-by-state so this is showing up as a lot of edits---hope that's ok. /blahedo (t) 20:08, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oops now I have to stop and might not get back to this for a while. I've gotten alphabetically through Kentucky on the full check-everything edits, and I just added in all the SBAC and PARCC info for the later states (current as of July 2015), but several of the ones after Kentucky are otherwise biased and/or out of date. I hope to get back to this at some point, but in the meantime, if someone else wants to take a hack at it, be my guest. /blahedo (t) 21:16, 17 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed that Wisconsin was listed as a governing member of the SBAC, but the attached citation does not have them as such. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.84.124.6 (talk) 00:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]