Jump to content

Talk:Quasistatic approximation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Henri BONDAR (talk | contribs) at 07:57, 5 February 2016 (Time retardated potentials and fields: new section). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconPhysics Stub‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Physics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Physics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StubThis article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page requires a profound reformatting. The title itself is problematic in electromagnetism, there is not one Quasistatic approximation but at least two. Both Quasistatic electric or Quasistatic magnetic can be shown to be Galinean limits for electromagnetism (see Levy-Leblond Galinean electromagnetism).Henri BONDAR (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 07:46, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

sections

I think the subject could be further improved, using sections. For instance one section can deal with Electromagnetism, another with thermodynamics..... A general introduction could be provided and the electromagnetic aspect moved to the corresponding section. --Henri BONDAR (talk) 14:37, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Time retardated potentials and fields

I dont think very appropriate to introduce these complex notions here as they are simplest ways to introduce quasistatic approximations (time constants evaluation, Galilean transformations) so if you have no objection, I planned to remove this idea from this general topic that should remain accessible to the largest panel of readers.--Henri BONDAR (talk) 07:57, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]