Jump to content

Talk:Example-based machine translation

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Fadesga (talk | contribs) at 17:26, 2 February 2016. The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconTranslation studies Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of the WikiProject Translation Studies, a collaborative effort to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Translation Studies. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of objectives.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconComputing: CompSci Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedy deleted as an unambiguous copyright infringement, because... (your reason here) --Cindyprcbj (talk) 18:50, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

it does not violate any copyright!

The article text can be found verbatim in the pdf file [1], starting on page 6 of the pdf (which is page one of the article). Nczempin (talk) 18:52, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Not a copyvio - it was copied from WP

This article is not, in fact, a copyvio, because the supposed source is headed "SEMINAR REPORT 2009-2011", but the relevant text was already in our article in this version in December 2006. It seems "Jessy K" copied Wikipedia (without acknowledgement), not the other way around. JohnCD (talk) 21:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, my mistake, sorry. The pretty unpolished-looking state of this article made me skip checking the obvious case. Nczempin (talk) 23:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]