Talk:Semantic HTML

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Semantic HTML article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Computing: Software Unassessed

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

Internet Unassessed

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for merging with HTML5 on August 2014. The result of the discussion was not merge.

Intro?

This is a talk page. Please respect the talk page guidelines, and remember to sign your posts by typing four tildes (112.215.36.144 (talk) 07:39, 20 April 2014 (UTC)).[reply]

Rewrite Suggested

The article doesn’t explain where semantics/meaning come from (agreement, essentially) and what different levels of agreement there are (standards, microformats, classes/IDs, &c.). Many conclusions of the article are consequentially false. Problems begin with the introductory statement that semantic HTML “reinforces semantics”; semantic HTML doesn’t reinforce semantics unless this is meant to say that oranges reinforce their being orange. Rich Snippets are probably a very, possibly too specific example, while RDF/Semantic Web could be good to elaborate on in the HTML realm. I don’t mean to bash here for there are some useful parts in the article, but overall I suggest a rewrite. (I’m merely suggesting, then, to rule out bias; I myself have explained semantics on my own site and at Google.—j9t (talk) 10:10, 27 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Semantic HTML. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 03:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]