Talk:I'm Goin' Down/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: IndianBio (talk · contribs) 14:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moisejp I will be reviewing the article. Let me know how busy you are for the resolutions. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:19, 21 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IndianBio, thanks so much for taking on this article! I should have a pretty good amount of time in the next two weeks for addressing your comments. Thanks again, looking forward to your review. Moisejp (talk) 03:40, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

We generally use {{hlist}} for the writers, producers, formats, genres etc. in the infobox so I suggest you include it also
Would you like to use the mdy preference of dates or you would like to keep the yyyy-mm-dd?
I like the chart table, but would prefer if the {{singlechart}} templates were used, since most of the times the urls for the charts go dead and one correction is enough to rectify them across the board. Not hard-and-fast though :)
Can we have a para break after "At first, Springsteen attempted full-band versions of .... "

Starting points, this article is small but very crisp. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 14:22, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IndianBio, thanks very much for your comments. Let me address these below:

I've added the hlis to the infobox as you suggested.
I broke up the long paragraph that you mentioned.
About the dates, I'm not sure whether you are saying there is currently a problem. I've been consistently using mdy in the main body of the text, and yyyymmdd in the references. Is that OK?
I'm not against using {{singlechart}}, but it looks like a totally different system that it would take time for me to sit down and figure out. I don't know if I will have time for that in the next several days. If it's optional, I'd rather keep my current template for now. Or, if you are really comfortable with formatting that template and feel you could do it quickly, by all means, I wouldn't object to you doing so. Thank you again for your comments, and let me know if you have other points to address. Moisejp (talk) 15:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]