Cowboy coding
![]() | This article has multiple issues. Please help improve it or discuss these issues on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove these messages)
|
Cowboy coding is software development where programmers have autonomy over the development process. This includes control of the project's schedule, languages, algorithms, tools, frameworks and coding style.
A cowboy coder can be a lone developer or part of a group of developers working with minimal process or discipline.[citation needed] Usually it occurs when there is little participation by business users, or fanned by management that controls only non-development aspects of the project, such as the broad targets, timelines, scope, and visuals (the "what", but not the "how").[citation needed]
"Cowboy coding" commonly sees usage as a derogatory term when contrasted with more structured software development methodologies.
Disadvantages
In cowboy coding, the lack of formal software project management methodologies may be indicative (though not necessarily) of a project's small size or experimental nature.[1] Software projects with these attributes may exhibit:
Lack of release structure
Lack of estimation or implementation planning might cause a project to be delayed. Sudden deadlines or pushes to release software may encourage the use of quick and dirty or code and fix techniques that will require further attention later.
Uncertain design requirements
Custom software applications, even when using a proven development cycle, can experience problems with the client concerning requirements. Cowboy coding can accentuate this problem by not scaling the requirements to a reasonable timeline, and might result in unused or unusable components being created before the project is finished. Similarly, projects with less tangible clients (often experimental projects, see independent game development) could begin with code and never a formal analysis of the design requirements. Lack of design analysis could lead to incorrect or insufficient technology choices, possibly requiring the developer to port or rewrite their software in order for the project to be completed.
Incompleteness
Many software development models, such as Extreme Programming, use an incremental approach which stresses that the software must be releasable at the end of each iteration. Non-managed projects may have few unit tests or working iterations, leaving an incomplete project unusable.
Advantages
- Developers maintain a free-form working environment that may encourage experimentation, learning, and free distribution of results.
- It allows developers to cross architectural and/or tiered boundaries to resolve design limitations and defects.
- Since coding can be done during the developer's free time, a hobby project could come to fruition which otherwise wouldn't have.[2]
See also
- Hacker (programmer subculture), a subculture that relies on the creativity of individual programmers
- Code monkey, a pejorative term for programmers who are employed to write simple or repetitive code
- Programming in the large and programming in the small
- Self-employment
- Indie game development
References
- ^ Hughes, Bob and Cotterell, Mike (2006). Software Project Management, pp.283-289. McGraw Hill Education, Berkshire. ISBN 0-07-710989-9
- ^ K, Alex. "Google's '20 percent time' in action", Official Google Blog, 2006-5-18
External links
- Cowboy Coder definition at Wards Wiki
- Cowboy Coding definition at Wards Wiki
- Delving into Cowboy Programming