Talk:Average memory access time

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer scienceWikipedia:WikiProject Computer scienceTemplate:WikiProject Computer scienceComputer science

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests :
- Requested articles/Applied arts and sciences/Computer science, computing, and Internet
Cleanup :
- Computer science articles needing attention
- Computer science articles needing expert attention
Copyedit :
- Computing
Expand :
- Computer science
Infobox :
- Computer science articles without infoboxes
Maintain :
- Timeline of computing 2020–present
Photo :
- Find pictures for the biographies of computer scientists (see List of computer scientists)
- Computing articles needing images
Stubs :
- Computer science stubs
Unreferenced :
- WikiProject Computer science/Unreferenced BLPs
Project-related :
- Tag all relevant articles in Category:Computer science and sub-categories with {{WikiProject Computer science}}

Proposed merge with Concurrent average memory access time

C-AMAT has been very recently proposed and seems not to have gained much traction yet; the sources for this article have attracted less than a handful of citations each. I suggest we relegate C-AMAT to a section of the article on AMAT. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:41, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Qwertyus, we believe C-AMAT has received significant attention as a memory metric and thus deserves its own wiki page. In fact, here are a few a links to its appearance on the news: hpctoday and ccf. Although recent, the C-AMAT wiki page has also been viewed over 700 times. However, the current statistics shown for the C-AMAT wiki are not correct. We believe this may have been caused by redirecting C-AMAT to this wiki page. Please let us know if you want any further information or any other questions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ahaider3 (talk • contribs) 01:01, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can't read the CCF page, but the HPC Today article was written by the same author as the references in the article. I wonder where the 700 figure comes from; I see 23 views in July and 2 in August. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:52, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just checked the citing references and I changed my mind regarding the merge. I'm going to put the page up for deletion instead. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 08:58, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]