Talk:Urban traffic modeling and analysis
Hello, I think that you made a really good job, the article it’s clear and easy to read. In my opinion they are just a few points to be improved:
Introduction:
- Acording to: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikip%C3%A9dia:R%C3%A9sum%C3%A9_introductif the introduction section must be placed just before the summary.
In the last paragraph:
- I guess you meant “Researchers” instead of “Researches”.
- I think that if you change the ‘.” in: “... analysis. By collecting ...” for a “,” the idea of this paragraph will be more clear.
DataSource:
- I think the correct phrase is: “The sources of which data can be collected to create a model are a key choice to the model and algorithms”.
Psycho-spacing models: “even when the headway distances is very large or small”
- The correct phrase might be: “even when the headway distances are very large or small” or “even when the headway distance is very large or small”
Specifications of model traffic characteristics:
- The sense of this phrase it’s not really clear: “Multiple process algorithms exists using different proven methodologies.” Do you mean: “The existing multiple process algorithms use different proven methodologies”?
- I guess you meant “often” instead of “ofter”.
Specifications of model traffic characteristics:
- I think the correct phrase is: “Algorithms may differ depending on the data of their model is based on or the way they structure and link these data.”
References:
- The referenced website in Reference 5 doesn’t contain a URL to the full article in pdf or in any format.