Utility functions on divisible goods
This page compares the properties of several typical utility functions of divisible goods. These functions are commonly used as examples in consumer theory.
The functions are ordinal utility functions, which means that their properties are invariant under positive monotone transformation. For example, the Cobb–Douglas function could also be written as: . Such functions only become interesting when there are two or more goods (with a single good, all monotonically increasing functions are ordinally equivalent).
The utility functions are exemplified for two goods, and . and are their prices. and are constant positive parameters. is a utility function of a single commodity ().
Name | Function | Indifference curves | Demand curve | Monotonicity | Convexity | Good type | Example |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Linear | Straight lines | Step function: only goods with minimum are demanded | Strong | Weak | Perfect substitutes | Potatoes of two different farms | |
Quasilinear | Parallel curves | Demand for is determined by: | Strong, if is increasing | Strong, if is concave | Substitutes, if is concave | Money () and another product () | |
Leontief | L-shapes | hyperbolic: | Weak | Weak | Perfect complements | Left and right shoes | |
Cobb–Douglas | hyperbolic | hyperbolic: | Strong | Strong | Independent | Apples and socks | |
Maximum | ר-shapes | Discontinuous step function: only one good with minimum is demanded | Weak | Concave | Substitutes and interfering | Two simultaneous movies |
References
- Hal Varian (2006). Intermediate micro-economics. ISBN 0393927024. chapter 5.
Acknowledgements
This page has been greatly improved thanks to comments in the following Economics StackExchange thread.