Talk:Technobabble
Appearance
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Varient
I'm troubled by the focus of this article on the use of jargon to obfuscated - I don't think it's at all the primary usage of the term. It seems to me primarily a disparagement of bad science fiction - something that is woefully undercovered in the article. Phil Sandifer 17:36, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
- I wouldn't want to see the definition as 'jargon to obfuscate' removed, but feel free to prune it back, and expand on the literary usage. I understand technobabble to be a varient of psychobabble or eduspeak, but certainly other uses exist. Tom Harrison Talk 18:29, 21 April 2006 (UTC)
Categories:
- All unassessed articles
- Start-Class WikiProject Business articles
- Mid-importance WikiProject Business articles
- WikiProject Business articles
- Start-Class Marketing & Advertising articles
- Mid-importance Marketing & Advertising articles
- WikiProject Marketing & Advertising articles
- Start-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- Start-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles