Talk:Image segmentation

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Start‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Robotics Start‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Robotics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Robotics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RoboticsWikipedia:WikiProject RoboticsTemplate:WikiProject RoboticsRobotics
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

It seems to me that connectedness for a digital image is rather distinct from just general "connected." I'd be willing to write up something about this, but I'm not sure if it would be seen as a little too specialized? Is this definition of connectedness too esoteric to add to the "connected" page? Wegsjac 04:23, 5 Apr 2005 (UTC)

image segmentation

If any one have a latest information about the topic image segmentation den mail me at my id e-mail address retracted — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.240.72.211 (talk) 08:25, 29 September 2011 (UTC) [reply]

Topic accessibility

There is a stark lack of images for a topic that could be much more intuitively be explained using diagrams, pictures etc. Admittedly I am not saying that I possess such visuals, merely suggesting this is the direction in which I believe the article should be improved. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 195.212.199.56 (talk) 12:19, 18 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]