Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/0x10c

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Reason Article is for a game that was cancelled before release. This game does not exist and most likely never will. Kirschkuchen (talk) 18:23, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Invalid deletion rationale. Regardless of the game being cancelled, it garnered lots of coverage in secondary reliable sources and passes WP:N. -- ferret (talk) 18:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. 18:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Keep per ferret. Game is notable despite having been cancelled. Sam Walton (talk) 18:33, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - invalid deletion rationale. Cancelled games can have articles if they meet the WP:GNG by being covered in many third party reliable sources, much like this game. Sergecross73 msg me 19:11, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep. Sourced or not its not particularly notable. DangerDogWest (talk) 19:31, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Uh, I mean, we're taking the same stance, so I'm not arguing with you...but can you expand on that a bit? I don't really understand how that description describes how you arrived at a "weak keep" response, and Admin commonly discount rationales that don't make sense or cite any policy... Sergecross73 msg me 19:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]