Talk:Inventor's notebook
![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
|
![]() Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III.
|
Document for a CAR!
Should "log book" redirect here? I thought a "log book" was a document for a car.
--JimmyTheWig 10:50, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Sorry, it seems like there is a difference between "logbook" and "log book". --JimmyTheWig 15:01, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
Proposed merge (with Lab notebook)
See Talk:Lab notebook#Merge. --Edcolins 20:42, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
POV?
The last paragraph of the "Purpose" section seems to have a fairly strong bias. 132.162.92.39 (talk) 07:17, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
Author's support for "first to file" is weasely
Saying that "First-to-file eliminates a troubling source of litigation" is opinionated, not NPOV. YamaPlos talk 00:05, 24 March 2012 (UTC)
signing and dating
AFAIK the signing and dating of an inventor's notebook is not necessary for "each entry". Signing and dating only proves that whatever is written after that signature and date happened after that signature and date. It establishes a time/date marker, and as such is irrelevant and not at all linked to any entry in particular. YamaPlos talk 00:06, 24 March 2012 (UTC)