Talk:Fifth Generation Computer Systems
NPOV?
I'm not disputing the conclusions, but some of the language in this article doesn't seem exactly NPOV. --Chronodm 12:21, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
link
i don't know if this is intended, but the follow-the-leader link directs to the page on the marching band move.Tobias087 01:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
NPOV
The POV is slightly less that neutral. There are subtle cultural problems, and a degree of revisionism inherent in what has been written here. I can tell you that workstations were an afterthought in the period between 1982-1984. Architectural decisions in Japan at the time were more slant toward mainframes. The article is missing 2 of the 3 basic key ideas Moto-Oka and others took away with some the FCGS conference: 1) Data flow (Jack Dennis' ideas), 2) Prolog (which the article has, and I am not clear with Warren was at the meeting like Jack was), and I think, 3) Knowledge bases (Feigenbaum?). Those were starting ideas, but Moto-Oka's book should be examined for these. These were somewhat alarming at the time to USA-ians. Also the project should also not be confused with a similar Japanese superspeed project (Science article). I am not clear where I would begin editing minus Moto-Oka's book. --enm ~21:00, 8 Aug 2006 (UTC)