Talk:Oops!... I Did It Again

This disambiguation page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Oops!... I Did It Again which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:59, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 18 September 2015

It has been proposed in this section that Oops!... I Did It Again be renamed and moved to Oops I Did It Again.

A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil.

Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly.

Links: current log • target log • direct move

Oops!... I Did It Again → Oops I Did It Again – Now that neither the album nor the song is primary topic, the dabpage shall have neither punctuations nor ellipses, especially for a general reader. Gh87 in the public computer (talk) 19:24, 18 September 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. George Ho (talk) 12:15, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you engaging in the WP:RM process because of punctuation? Why would be this considered contentious? --Joy [shallot] (talk) 19:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just in case, Joy, that someone would overlook past RMs and change name to something that consensus would be already against. --George Ho (talk) 07:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. The majority of the pages listed on this dab use the "!...", and both of the articles that readers are likely be searching for (the album and the song) use it. I see no benefit in moving this. Jenks24 (talk) 11:25, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Correction: three are using it; one, just "!"; and other, ",". --George Ho (talk) 23:53, 24 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I said... "the majority" = three out of five. Jenks24 (talk) 13:58, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Jenks24. O N R (talk) 03:05, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jenks24. Steel1943 (talk) 21:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Steel1943. –Davey2010^Talk 21:03, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the disambiguation page should be at the base or most inclusive title. Peter James (talk) 20:38, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]