Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The acorn paradox
- The acorn paradox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I am making this nomination on behalf of 85.178.217.32 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). The reason stated is:
- The topic is not notable in any way. No search results not originating here.
Procedural nomination: I express no opinion. JohnCD (talk) 18:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:55, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - What a shame that three of us jumped in to PROD without noticing it had already been dePRODded and thus ineligible. To echo my comment there, this particular example looks to be specific to the book The Glimmering Time. If we had an article for that title a redirect might make sense, but we don't. Fails WP:GNG. — Rhododendrites talk \\ 18:57, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
- Snow tends to obscure the ground. ;) 85.178.200.49 (talk) 01:22, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
- Delete seems like a run of the mill time travel paradox with nothing to lend it notability. Artw (talk) 19:19, 13 September 2015 (UTC)