This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Retailing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of retailing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RetailingWikipedia:WikiProject RetailingTemplate:WikiProject RetailingRetailing
What a ridiculously one-sided article! I work in a gift shop that uses PLU codes for everything from glassware and picture frames to novelty lollies and smoking paraphernalia. If you want information on PLU codes, don't go to Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.38.229.134 (talk) 01:10, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Political Malarkey
"Of course, producers and retailers in the United States avoid labeling food as genetically modified, because they do not want to scare away consumers who have been riled up by anti-GM activists such as Jeffrey M. Smith (see, e.g., The New York Times).[3]" is a political statement, not one of fact. These sorts of statements makes Wikipedia a second class source of information. Opinion and fact are two different things. Just because you can quote an opinion does not turn it into fact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.171.17.134 (talk) 00:19, 4 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
