Talk:List of multiple-system operators

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

First phrase

"A Multiple System Operator or Multi System Operator (MSO) is an operator of multiple systems"

sortable table

why isn't the table sortable like a normal one? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.216.39.121 (talk) 02:13, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is that why India's "Siti Cable" is not placed correctly in the second table? I've also noticed that a few of the references for this article have expired, and I haven't been able to confirm some of the subscriber counts (especially the Indian telcos.) Scyllagist (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From where did the technology classifications come? Verizon FiOS uses QAM (sending a "cable TV" signal over optical fiber) while AT&T U-Verse is a true IPTV provider. Now I don't know if I can trust any of the other entries. In a similar vein, Google Fiber doesn't even belong on the list, which calls into question the objectivity of the whole exercise. Frank MacCrory (talk) 22:06, 14 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]