Jump to content

Talk:Sparse array

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by 119.2.51.138 (talk) at 23:19, 2 August 2015 (= Redundant). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.
WikiProject iconComputer science Redirect‑class
WikiProject iconThis redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computer science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Computer science related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
RedirectThis redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Things you can help WikiProject Computer science with:

Template:IEP assignment

Redundant

This article should link to the sparse matrix article, which is the same concept, but a much better writing.

TeX showing

I'm not sure how to represent sparse arrays otherwise I would try to fix it up myself. Your TeX is showing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 199.111.248.59 (talk) 16:49, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Fewer iterations

"Also, when a linked list is used, the array elements can be accessed through fewer iterations than in a normal array."

Don't get this part. --77.20.127.214 (talk) 03:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't get it either, sounds counter-intuitive. 185.31.142.251 (talk) 13:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sparse array a special case of a more general concept?

I know talk pages are not for asking questions or discussing a topic, but I have a feeling that sparse arrays may be a special case of a more general concept, and wonder whether that concept (which I don't know the name of) should be linked to from here. I am thinking that "in which most of the elements have the same value" (that is ai = k for some constant k, often 0), could be generalised to ai in K, where K is a set of values. Googling hasn't come up with anything for me, so maybe such a generalisation hasn't come up in the field? I find that hard to believe, though. --Lasse Hillerøe Petersen (talk) 22:06, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]