Talk:Special member functions

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Special member functions article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Computing Stub‑class Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

C/C++ Stub‑class Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject C/C++, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of C and C++ topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.C/C++Wikipedia:WikiProject C/C++Template:WikiProject C/C++C/C++
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
	This article falls within the scope of C++.

Untitled

We might want to rename the example class something other than "Explicit." It could cause confusion with the 'explicit' keyword whose existence would change the behavior of some of the special member functions. I couldn't think of a good replacement name for the class on the spot, so I didn't change it. 23:41, 17 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.197.216.61 (talk)

Example

I've updated the entry to refer to C++11 but the example still refers to C++98. The example should also be updated. Motti (talk) 12:24, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake in Destructor

In the signatures, the destructor's name should start with a tilde.

68.65.169.12 (talk) 17:16, 31 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]