User talk:Lacmaboingo

Welcome!

Hello, Lacmaboingo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 00:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC).

July 2015

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 04:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lacmaboingo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Account here has done no abuse, reported other users vandalizing and reverted aforesaid vandals' edits, significantly contributed to college articles including a profundity of admissions statistics tables (see Dartmouth College, Carleton College, Bowdoin College, Williams College, Amherst College, Swarthmore College, and Talk:Scripps College and Talk:Carleton College for my plans to help revamp these struggling articles to be more accurate in regards to specific sections (see Talk:Bowdoin College for my suggestion to limit the number of images for the article to be less cluttered and to have a more professional heir), remove boosterism, and hopefully be regarded as A-class articles. Please review the rest of my contributions to further evidence my assertions), and made significant constructive edits to many college articles including removing NPOV violations. I completely understand if this account remains banned as a result of the other abusive accounts on this shared network, but be aware that you will be losing a significant member of the Wikipedia editing community working to create a more positive, accurate, and overall better Wikipedia, especially in regards to articles concerning institutions of higher education including liberal arts colleges about which I pride myself on being knowledgeable.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 06:04, 19 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.