User talk:Lacmaboingo
Welcome!

Hello, Lacmaboingo, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
- The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)
You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}}
before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 00:20, 26 April 2015 (UTC).
July 2015
![]() | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 04:38, 18 July 2015 (UTC) |

Lacmaboingo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Notes:
- In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
- Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:
{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Account here has done no abuse, reported other users vandalizing and reverted aforesaid vandals' edits, significantly contributed to college articles including a profundity of admissions statistics tables (see [[Dartmouth College]], [[Carleton College]], [[Bowdoin College]], [[Williams College]], [[Amherst College]], [[Swarthmore College]], and [[Talk:Scripps College]] and [[Talk:Carleton College]] for my plans to help revamp these struggling articles to be more accurate in regards to specific sections (see [[Talk:Bowdoin College]] for my suggestion to limit the number of images for the article to be less cluttered and to have a more professional heir), remove [[Wikipedia:Avoid academic boosterism|boosterism]], and hopefully be regarded as A-class articles. Please review the rest of my [[Special:Contributions/Lacmaboingo|contributions]] to further evidence my assertions), and made significant constructive edits to many college articles including removing [[Wikipedia:NPOV|NPOV]] violations. I completely understand if this account remains banned as a result of the other abusive accounts on this shared network, but be aware that you will be losing a significant member of the Wikipedia editing community working to create a more positive, accurate, and overall better Wikipedia, especially in regards to articles concerning institutions of higher education including [[Liberal arts colleges|liberal arts colleges]] about which I pride myself on being knowledgeable. |3 = ~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}}
with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.
{{unblock reviewed |1=Account here has done no abuse, reported other users vandalizing and reverted aforesaid vandals' edits, significantly contributed to college articles including a profundity of admissions statistics tables (see [[Dartmouth College]], [[Carleton College]], [[Bowdoin College]], [[Williams College]], [[Amherst College]], [[Swarthmore College]], and [[Talk:Scripps College]] and [[Talk:Carleton College]] for my plans to help revamp these struggling articles to be more accurate in regards to specific sections (see [[Talk:Bowdoin College]] for my suggestion to limit the number of images for the article to be less cluttered and to have a more professional heir), remove [[Wikipedia:Avoid academic boosterism|boosterism]], and hopefully be regarded as A-class articles. Please review the rest of my [[Special:Contributions/Lacmaboingo|contributions]] to further evidence my assertions), and made significant constructive edits to many college articles including removing [[Wikipedia:NPOV|NPOV]] violations. I completely understand if this account remains banned as a result of the other abusive accounts on this shared network, but be aware that you will be losing a significant member of the Wikipedia editing community working to create a more positive, accurate, and overall better Wikipedia, especially in regards to articles concerning institutions of higher education including [[Liberal arts colleges|liberal arts colleges]] about which I pride myself on being knowledgeable. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock reviewed |1=Account here has done no abuse, reported other users vandalizing and reverted aforesaid vandals' edits, significantly contributed to college articles including a profundity of admissions statistics tables (see [[Dartmouth College]], [[Carleton College]], [[Bowdoin College]], [[Williams College]], [[Amherst College]], [[Swarthmore College]], and [[Talk:Scripps College]] and [[Talk:Carleton College]] for my plans to help revamp these struggling articles to be more accurate in regards to specific sections (see [[Talk:Bowdoin College]] for my suggestion to limit the number of images for the article to be less cluttered and to have a more professional heir), remove [[Wikipedia:Avoid academic boosterism|boosterism]], and hopefully be regarded as A-class articles. Please review the rest of my [[Special:Contributions/Lacmaboingo|contributions]] to further evidence my assertions), and made significant constructive edits to many college articles including removing [[Wikipedia:NPOV|NPOV]] violations. I completely understand if this account remains banned as a result of the other abusive accounts on this shared network, but be aware that you will be losing a significant member of the Wikipedia editing community working to create a more positive, accurate, and overall better Wikipedia, especially in regards to articles concerning institutions of higher education including [[Liberal arts colleges|liberal arts colleges]] about which I pride myself on being knowledgeable. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Lacmaboingo (block log • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • user rights management • checkuser (log))
Block ID: #6247096 (BlockList • unblock)
Blocking admin: Ceradon (talk • blocks)
Block message:
WARNING: If you were blocked directly then you are using the wrong template and your block will not be reviewed since you have not provided a reason for unblocking. Please use {{unblock | reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
instead.
If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, or when you need checkuser assistance, please place {{subst:Unblock on hold-notification | 1=Lacmaboingo}}
on the administrator's talk page. Then replace this template with the following:
{{unblock-auto on hold | 1=Ceradon | 2=<nowiki>troll</nowiki> | 3=127.0.0.1 | 4=6247096 | 5=~~~~}}
If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting decline reason here
with any specific rationale. If the decline=
parameter is omitted, a reason for unblocking will be requested.
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>troll</nowiki> | 3=Ceradon | decline=decline reason here ~~~~}}
If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting accept reason here
with your rationale:
{{unblock-auto reviewed | 1=127.0.0.1 | 2=<nowiki>troll</nowiki> | 3=Ceradon | accept=accept reason here ~~~~}}