Talk:Ring learning with errors key exchange

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article was accepted from this draft on 12 June 2015 by reviewer Joseph2302 (talk · contribs).

Cryptography: Computer science C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cryptography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cryptography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CryptographyWikipedia:WikiProject CryptographyTemplate:WikiProject CryptographyCryptography
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computer science.

Based on the comments posted, I have added a lead section which is hopefully suitable for general audiences. I have also added more commentary in other parts of the article to clarify things for less mathematically inclined readers. The links throughout the article are important because the provide more background for readers who are less familiar with some of the concepts. Jinbolin (talk) 02:45, 4 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jinbolin. The new Lead looks very good. Carvalho1988 (talk) 01:22, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Joseph2302, Thank you for your comment. If you look at the Ring Learning with Errors Key Exchange now you will see that Jinbolin has added an excellent lead section that should provide more of what you are looking for. I have added some more references and added a section on other approaches to solving the same problem that the article presents. Thanks. Carvalho1988 (talk) 01:51, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that the improvements made by Jinbolin and his colleagues are ready to be reviewed. I have gone through the article again to check the mathematics against the references and things match. Just waiting on further review. Carvalho1988 (talk) 00:28, 11 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]