Talk:APA Ethics Code
Ethics Article
Assignment 5
List one item (from the Talk section if appropriate) identifying a problem or issue with the article. Cite two references that do not already appear in the article's reference list that contain information relevant to this article. These must be legitimate publications - published books or journal articles. Web pages (including other Wikipedia articles) do not count. List two questions or comments for me regarding the article. I will address these on the Talk page of your sandbox.
Brandon's List
– Problem:
–the article does not yet exist.
– Two References:
– Ethics and Society: Ethical analysis and new sfrom the Fordham University Center for Ethics Education [1] – Ethics in Psychology [2]
– Questions or Comments:
– none yet, will update as I proceed.
Brandon.saxton (talk) 18:20, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
Sam's List
- Problem:
- The articles that exist now only relate to a general "code of ethics" or something similar and frankly do not do that great of a job even for those topics.
- References:
- Ethics Code, APA (this needs to be cited correctly, I could not figure out how to cite an article from an encyclopedia) [3]
- Essential Ethics for Psychologists [4]
- Questions/Comments:
- How far away from APA should we stray for resources for this topic?
- How do you know when you might have "too much" in an article and think we should maybe break things into separate articles. For example if we wanted to break things into clinical ethics and research ethics?
--Samantha.myhre (talk) 04:15, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Brittany's List
Problem: The article does not exist.
References:
- APA's website on practice ethics[5]
- APA's website on research ethics[6]
- One of the links Jim sent us.[7] This may be dated enough to serve as part of our history (1992); we'll have to determine that upon delving in.
Two questions or comments:
- There is a very complete general "Ethics" page that we should add a blurb to, as well as a link to our page. Someone had already proposed adding a brief psychology and/or research section on the talk page of this article, and I replied mentioning that we could link to our main article and just put our lead on the main Ethics page or something brief.
- I am wondering how much emphasis is warranted on each ethics in practice and research, and whether these two should be synthesized in one article (perhaps titled "Ethics in Psychology") or if these should be separated into two articles.
Britty5096 (talk) 12:58, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
David's list
Problem: The article does not currently exist. Ethics in psychological research may partially exist in other pages.
References:
Questions/comments:
- There is already a Wikipedia article about institutional review boards. It is obviously not exhaustive, but, to avoid too much overlap, I think we should focus this new article on ethics in psychological clinical practice, like what Sam suggested. This focused article could then more deeply investigate and report on the steps APA has taken to establish a modern code of ethics.
- Our current starting place may possibly be ethnocentric in that it is focused almost exclusively on ethics in psychology in the U.S. Does APA have global influence? Should we instead specify that this is a regional description of ethics in psychology?
Dareichenberger (talk) 18:07, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
Tharaki's List
- Problem: There is no specific article on the ethics code for Psychology (Research and Practice) but just a few articles mentioning professional ethics in general (not specific to Psychology).
- References:
Changes in ethics code in 2002 [10]
Historical perspective [11]
Ethical principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct [12]
- Questions/Comments:
The ethics code includes five general principle and ten ethical standards. To what extent should we discuss these, since there is a lot of detail under each of these? Is it necessary that we address each and every standard?
The ethics code has been revised a number of times. Should each of these changes be addressed in the article or only the changes that we think are significant?
References
- ^ "Ethics and Society: Ethical analysis and news from the Fordham University Center for Ethics Education". Center for Ethics Education.
- ^ Ethics in Psychology: Professional Standards and Cases (Second ed.). Oxford University Press. 1998. ISBN 0195092015.
- ^ Vasquez, Melba (2015). The Encyclopedia of Clinical Psychology: Ethics Code, APA. Wiley. pp. 1–3.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Nagy, Thomas (2011). Essential Ethics for Psychologists: A Primer for Understanding and Mastering Core Issues. American Psychological Association. ISBN 978-1-4338-0863-0.
{{cite book}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ American Psychological Association. "Ethical Principles of Psychologist". APA Ethics Code. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
- ^ American Psychological Association. "Research Ethics". APA Research Ethics. Retrieved 27 May 2015.
- ^ Pope, Kenneth S.; Vetter, Valerie A. (1992). "Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey". American Psychologist. 47 (3): 397–411.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ "The Belmont Report". HHS.gov. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Retrieved 28 May 2015.
- ^ "Federalwide Assurance (FWA) for the Protection of Human Subjects". HHS.gov. U.S. Department of Health & Human Services. Retrieved 28 May 2015.
- ^ Knapp, Samuel ; VandeCreek, Leon (2003). "An Overview of the Major Changes in the 2002 APA Ethics". Professional Psychology; Research and Practice. 34 (3): 301–308.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Walsh, Richard T. D. (2015). "Introduction to Ethics in Psychology:Historical and Philosophical". Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. 35 (2): 69–77.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ American Psychological Association. "Ethical principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct". Retrieved 28 May 2015.
Assignment 6
To-Do List
- Weave together a coherent story of the history of ethics
- Describe current and past ethical codes
- Gather examples of psychological ethics controversies, describe
- Write a lead that summarizes the most important points from the article
- Link this page to many other relevant pages
- Write a paragraph for general Ethics page and link to here for main article
- Insert links to our page in other relevant pages
Outline
Title: Ethical Principles of Psychologist
Lead: Introduction/current conceptualization within psychology
Current APA Ethical Principles of Psychologist and Code of Conduct[1]
- 5 General Principles
- Principle A
- Principle B
- Principle C
- Principle D
- Principle E
- 10 Ethical Standards
- Ethical Standard 1
- Ethical Standard 2
- Ethical Standard 3
- Ethical Standard 4
- Ethical Standard 5
- Ethical Standard 6
- Ethical Standard 7
- Ethical Standard 8
- Ethical Standard 9
- Ethical Standard 10
History/historical development[2][3]
Controversies
- Conversion therapy[4] plus current standing
- Use of treatments with questionable empirical support[5]
- Dual relationships[6] plus current standing and cases
- Any other controversial ethical topics concerning practice
Further readings
References
References
On the Ethics of Psychological Research[7]
The History of Ethical Codes and Licensure[8]
Ethical Standards for Psychology[9]
Guidelines for Psychological Evaluations in Child Protection Matters [10]
Psychology Graduate Training in the Era of Online Social Networking [11]
- ^ American Psychological Association. "Ethical principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct". Retrieved 28 May 2015.
- ^ Knapp, Samuel ; VandeCreek, Leon (2003). "An Overview of the Major Changes in the 2002 APA Ethics". Professional Psychology; Research and Practice. 34 (3): 301–308.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Pope, Kenneth S.; Vetter, Valerie A. (1992). "Ethical dilemmas encountered by members of the American Psychological Association: A national survey". American Psychologist. 47 (3): 397–411.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Haldeman, Douglas, C. (1994). "The practice and ethics of sexual orientation conversion therapy". Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 62 (2): 221–227. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.62.2.221.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Check|doi=
value (help); External link in
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|doi=
- ^ Lilienfeld, Scott O. (2007). "Psychological Treatments That Cause Harm". Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2 (1): 53–70.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help) - ^ Borys, Debra S.; Pope, Kenneth S. (1989). "Dual relationships between therapist and client: A national study of psychologists, psychiatrists, and social workers". Professional Psychology: Research and Practice. 20 (5): 283–293. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0735-7028.20.5.283.
{{cite journal}}
:|access-date=
requires|url=
(help); Check|doi=
value (help); External link in
(help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)|doi=
- ^ Schlenker, Barry R.; Forsyth, Donelson R. (1977). "On the Ethics of Psychological Research". Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. 13: 369–396.
- ^ Sinclair, Carole; Simon, Norma P.; Pettifor, Jean L. (1996). Professional Conduct and Discipline in Psychology: The History of Ethical Codes and Licensure. Montgomery, AL, US: American Psychological Association. p. 330.
- ^ Golann, Stuart E. (1970). "Ethical Standards for Psychology". Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 169: 398–405. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.1970.tb54749.x.
- ^ American Psychological Association (2013). "Guidelines for Psychological Evaluations in Child Protection Matter". American Psychologist. 68 (1): 20–31.
- ^ Myers; et al. (2012). "Psychology Graduate Training in the Era of Online Social Networking". Training and Education in professional Psychology. 6 (1): 28–36.
{{cite journal}}
: Explicit use of et al. in:|last1=
(help)
Division of Work
Title: Ethical Principles of Psychologist
Lead = Everyone
Current APA Ethical Principles of Psychologist and Code of Conduct
- 5 General Principles = David
- Principle A: Beneficence and nonmaleficence
- Principle B: Fidelity and responsibility
- Principle C: Integrity
- Principle D: Justice
- Principle E: Respect for people's rights and dignitity
- 10 Ethical Standards = Tharaki and Brandon
- Ethical Standard 1
- Ethical Standard 2
- Ethical Standard 3
- Ethical Standard 4
- Ethical Standard 5
- Ethical Standard 6
- Ethical Standard 7
- Ethical Standard 8
- Ethical Standard 9
- Ethical Standard 10
History/historical development = Sam
Controversies = Brittany
- Conversion therapy plus current standing
- Use of treatments with questionable empirical support
- Dual relationships plus current standing and cases
- Any other controversial ethical topics concerning practice
Further readings = Everyone
References = Everyone
I guess we'll need to choose exactly which of our 5 different outlines/layouts we would like to go with in order to know exactly what work there is to divide, but regardless of the exact layout, I'm sure we'll have some sort of controversies section, right? I offer to work on some of the current and past ethical controversies, including the ones I listed in my outline, but of course I am open to suggestions about what to include in that section.
Britty5096 (talk) 02:05, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
I included this above, but I would like to work on the history of the ethical code if possible. Or at the least the where it got started portion. Samantha.myhre (talk) 05:34, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
I would like to take the part on the current Ethic code,if that is OK with the others. TJS1989 (talk) 18:09, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
I will accept the responsibility of writing up the general principles and contributing to the lead and any other parts that need help. I plan to reduce each principle to its core statement(s). I'm not sure how lengthy these will be but I will try to make sure they are adequately representative of the principle. Dareichenberger (talk) 19:42, 31 May 2015 (UTC)