Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibonacci hyperbolic functions

Fibonacci hyperbolic functions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ostensibly this subject has many sources in poor-quality academic journals. However, after combing through them, I found that sources which mention "Fibonacci hyperbolic functions" do so only in passing, and all seem to refer to papers from Chaos, Solitons, & Fractals, which is a rag. I can't find reliable sources which discuss them in any depth. Sammy1339 (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Hardly qualifies as an article as it does not explain their significance or give any context as to why they are important, it's just a list of formulae and image. But looking at the definitions they are just trivial transformations of the hyperbolic functions by the golden ratio, so entirely uninteresting.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 12:40, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP- A search with google on "hyperbolicfibonacci functions " comes up 243,000 results

https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=cr&ei=-AVOVaKTCY6OyASNqoD4CQ#q=hyperbolic+fibonacci+functions&spell=1

including CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Second Edition (Poor quality???,ignorant !!) https://books.google.ca/books?id=aFDWuZZslUUC&pg=PA1038&dq=hyperbolic+fibonacci+functions&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mQtOVYWuCo2nyAS3goCoCg&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=hyperbolic%20fibonacci%20functions&f=false

There is even a book

https://books.google.ca/books?id=KkLfBQgYfdgC&pg=PA124&dq=hyperbolic+fibonacci+functions&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mQtOVYWuCo2nyAS3goCoCg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=hyperbolic%20fibonacci%20functions&f=false

Very interesting subject indeed. , notability is clearly none issue. --唐戈 (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia missing article

Fibonacci hyperbolic functions is an article requested by

Wikipedia:Missing science topics/Maths10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by --

Published on Official Fibonacci Quarterly

Fibonacci Quarter--Official Fibonacci Society

Delete per Blackburne. Trivial modification of standard hyperbolic functions. There is no useful encyclopedic content. Sławomir Biały (talk) 16:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment--It is listed in CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics,you are bloody ignorant

https://books.google.ca/books?id=aFDWuZZslUUC&pg=PA1038&dq=hyperbolic+fibonacci+functions&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mQtOVYWuCo2nyAS3goCoCg&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=hyperbolic%20fibonacci%20functions&f=false

and Mathworld,

Wikipedia:Coverage of Mathworld topics#F Can you explain why content listed in Mathworld should not appear on wikipedia

Commment Provide valid reason an article requested by Wikipedia Mising Science topis should be deleted and remain missing ???????????

Wikipedia missing science topics--唐戈 (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Comment-唐戈-sorry you can't vote more then once. Wgolf (talk) 16:43, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]