Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fibonacci hyperbolic functions

Fibonacci hyperbolic functions

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Ostensibly this subject has many sources in poor-quality academic journals. However, after combing through them, I found that sources which mention "Fibonacci hyperbolic functions" do so only in passing, and all seem to refer to papers from Chaos, Solitons, & Fractals, which is a rag. I can't find reliable sources which discuss them in any depth. Sammy1339 (talk) 21:21, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

delete. Hardly qualifies as an article as it does not explain their significance or give any context as to why they are important, it's just a list of formulae and image. But looking at the definitions they are just trivial transformations of the hyperbolic functions by the golden ratio, so entirely uninteresting.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 12:40, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

KEEP- A search with google on "hyperbolicfibonacci functions " comes up 243,000 results

https://www.google.ca/?gws_rd=cr&ei=-AVOVaKTCY6OyASNqoD4CQ#q=hyperbolic+fibonacci+functions&spell=1

including CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics, Second Edition (Poor quality???,ignorant !!) https://books.google.ca/books?id=aFDWuZZslUUC&pg=PA1038&dq=hyperbolic+fibonacci+functions&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mQtOVYWuCo2nyAS3goCoCg&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=hyperbolic%20fibonacci%20functions&f=false

There is even a book

https://books.google.ca/books?id=KkLfBQgYfdgC&pg=PA124&dq=hyperbolic+fibonacci+functions&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mQtOVYWuCo2nyAS3goCoCg&ved=0CDkQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=hyperbolic%20fibonacci%20functions&f=false

Very interesting subject indeed. , notability is clearly none issue. --唐戈 (talk) 13:23, 9 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Wikipedia missing article

Fibonacci hyperbolic functions is an article requested by

Wikipedia:Missing science topics/Maths10 — Preceding unsigned comment added by --

Published on Official Fibonacci Quarterly

Fibonacci Quarter--Official Fibonacci Society

Delete per Blackburne. Trivial modification of standard hyperbolic functions. There is no useful encyclopedic content. Sławomir Biały (talk) 16:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment--It is listed in CRC Concise Encyclopedia of Mathematics,you are bloody ignorant

https://books.google.ca/books?id=aFDWuZZslUUC&pg=PA1038&dq=hyperbolic+fibonacci+functions&hl=en&sa=X&ei=mQtOVYWuCo2nyAS3goCoCg&ved=0CCsQ6AEwAw#v=onepage&q=hyperbolic%20fibonacci%20functions&f=false

and Mathworld,

Wikipedia:Coverage of Mathworld topics#F Can you explain why content listed in Mathworld should not appear on wikipedia

Commment Unless you remove it from widipedia missing topic list

Wikipedia missing science topics--唐戈 (talk) 17:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC).[reply]

Comment-唐戈-sorry you can't vote more then once. Wgolf (talk) 16:43, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]