Talk:IRIG timecode

Time C‑class High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Time, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Time on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TimeWikipedia:WikiProject TimeTemplate:WikiProject TimeTime
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

suggestion 2

Reference to IRIG-J-1x and 2x seems to be missing. Apparently these formats are structurally different and covered by a separate standard 212-00. ASCII expression: <SOH>DDD:HH:MM:SS.S<CR><LF>. Unfortunately my level of expertise (and English knowledge) does not allow me to integrate this "missing item" into the existing article. Anyone feel like to fill this gap ? Thanks for the wikipedians.

Pierre from Belgium--212.68.214.146 (talk) 09:23, 6 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From Rairden

Good article guys, nice one. TiHead 14:53, 11 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This reference appears to be stale, or password protected.

IRIG standard 200-04 (PDF)

http://www.jcte.jcs.mil/RCC/manuals/200-04/TT-45.pdf

Rairden 07:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

suggestion

I would suggest starting the article with a brief description of what IRIG time codes are, i.e. a dummed down description of what they are and what are they used for and stuff, before writing the history of them. Most people, including myself, search terms in wikipedia to get a quick idea of what those sort of technical terms mean. If needed, one can read on further to get more detail.

... my 2 cents.

I agree - I came here because I read the term in a document and wanted to know what it means. I scanned through this article and still have no idea what IRIG-B is used for or where.

Fishtrousers (talk) 15:24, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

correction

A list of "... recognized combinations ..." is listed. IMHO the writer was probably referring to an earlier version of the standard.
Table 4-1 of the new IRIG 200-04 standard permits other formats!
For example, Table 4.3 there specifically shows B124 to B127 examples, none of these listed in the "... recognized combinations ..." here.

more on combinations

B002 is a common combination. In fact, several IRIG clocks use B002 as a valid combination.

--207.232.27.5 (talk) 10:34, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]