Jump to content

Comparison of backup software

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Me and (talk | contribs) at 10:57, 1 May 2015 (WP:WTAF). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.


Feature comparison of backup software for a more general comparison see List of backup software.

Open Source

Package Network optimized (rsync) Versioning (diff, chunk, hardlink) Full client side Encryption Error Detection Simple server Distributed partials Renames optimized Web interface Webmin module
AMANDA ? ? Optional (separate download + cost)
Areca Backup ? ? No
BackupPC No Yes No
Bacula Yes; Incremental Yes Yes Yes
Back In Time Yes Yes; hard-links Yes; EncFS No No
Box Backup ? No No
cpio No No No Yes No No No ? Optional (separate download)
Cobian Backup (v11) ? No ?
Cwrsync - Rsync for Windows Yes No No No No No No No No
DirSync Pro No No No
DAR No Yes; Incremental Yes Yes ? ? ? ?
dcfldd No No No No No No No No No
dd No No No No No No No No No
dump No No No No No No No No No
duplicity Yes Yes; Incremental Yes No Yes No No No
Duplicati Yes Yes; Incremental Yes No Yes No Partial (Only in Preview) No
FlyBack No ? No
luckyBackup No No No
Mondo Rescue Yes Yes; Incremental No Yes ? No
obnam Yes chunk Yes Yes No No
QtdSync No No No
Redo Backup and Recovery No No No
rdiff-backup No Yes; reverse incremental No No No No Yes Yes
rsync Yes No No No No No No ? Optional (separate downloads)
Zmanda Recovery Manager Yes ? ? No
git Yes Yes; snapshot No Yes No No Yes ? ?
BitTorrent Yes No No Yes No Yes No Yes ?
zsync Yes No No Yes Yes No Yes No No

References