Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SSC buffer

SSC buffer

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This seems to be more of a dictdef than an article; perhaps my lack of expertise in this area means I've misunderstood. This has been tagged for notability for 7 years; hopefully we can now get it resolved. Boleyn (talk) 14:39, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 14 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 00:33, 21 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nakon 01:27, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete. Judging from the hits on Google books, this seems to be extremely widely used in biological experiments, but I was unable to find in-depth sourcing on its uses and properties. Searching for "saline-sodium citrate" + "buffers" (note plural) helped avoid the many hits in which it is mentioned only trivial as one ingredient in a recipe, but even so the remaining hits were not of high quality. So it looks like the sort of thing that should be notable, but I was unable to find convincing evidence that it actually is notable. And in any case we wouldn't lose much by deleting the article as nominated; if better sources turn up, it can always be re-created. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:53, 30 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]