Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy
The Project on Scientific Knowledge and Public Policy (SKAPP), based at the George Washington University in Washington, DC, examines the nature of science and the ways in which it is both used and misused in government decision-making and legal proceedings. Through empirical research, conversations among scholars, and publications, SKAPP aims to enhance understanding of how knowledge is generated and interpreted. SKAPP promotes transparent decision-making based on the best available science in order to promote public safety and health.
Major support for SKAPP is provided by the Common Benefit Trust, a fund established pursuant to a court order in the Silicone Gel Breast Implant Products Liability litigation, with additional support from the Alice Hamilton Fund and the Bauman Foundation.
Scientific Evidence and the Law
The Supreme Court has issued three rulings which greatly impact the role scientists may play in providing expert testimony. These rulings are Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, General Electric v. Joiner, and Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael. Each address the "gatekeeper" role of the judge in determining the admissability of expert testimony, with considerable implications for tort litigation.
See also
Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals
External links
- SKAPP Website, www.defendingscience.org
- Defending Science in the Courts, from www.defendingscience.org
- Science in Government Decision Making, from www.defendingscience.org