Wikipedia talk:Protocol-relative URL

Essay or Policy?

The page is currently tagged with Template:Essay. However, there has already been consensus to use Protocol-relative URLs when websites support both HTTP and HTTPS. I have changed the template to Template:Policy per WP:BOLD but the change was soon reverted by Green Cardamom, citing the fact that "the discussion doesn't concern the implementation of this proposal." I don't really understand how that works; if the community has already decided to "use HTTPS links for HTTPS only sites, protocol relative links for sites that support both HTTP and HTTPS, and HTTP links for sites that don't support HTTPS at all", why is a page saying that PRURLs should be used still just an "essay" of opinions?

(Pinging all users who have been involved in the past three proposals: @Armbrust:, @DESiegel:, @Bender235:, @Mogism:, @Redrose64:, @Johnuniq:, @Ryan lane:, @Auric:, @Werdna:, @Ypnypn:, @Killiondude:, @Jeremyb:, @Nil Einne:, @SarekOfVulcan:, @Novusuna:, @GoingBatty:, @It Is Me Here:, @Green Cardamom:, @Killiondude:, @Gadget850:, @BJorsch (WMF):, @Makyen:, @Psychonaut:)

Thanks, Tony Tan · talk 14:42, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See the banner at the top of the page which says "Essays are not Wikipedia policies or guidelines. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints." (emphasis added). That's all a norm with consensus. Policies are serious we can't just decide to make something an official policy (I don't believe). Suggest posting on Wikipedia:Village pump to see how something is declared policy. -- GreenC 15:01, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Tony Tan: Your multiple {{ping}} appears to have failed - I didn't get a notification, so I suspect that the 22 others didn't either (I believe that there is an upper limit for the number of users that you can notify). I spotted this because I already had the page watchlisted. --Redrose64 (talk) 15:51, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]