Module talk:WikidataCheck
Script errors
This module has placed several pages in Category:Pages with script errors. Please fix it. Dragons flight (talk) 07:22, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Fixed And next time, please see if the error is simple enough to fix yourself. -happy5214 08:04, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
change mw.wikibase.getEntitiy (deprecated) to mw.wikibase.getEntityObject
 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
I am trying to change all important modules using mw.wikibase.getEntity() which is deprecated to mw.wikibase.getEntityObject(). You can find more details here [1]. If you could change it on this module, that would be great! Thank you a lot! --Lucie Kaffee (WMDE) (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC) Lucie Kaffee (WMDE) (talk) 13:33, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
Not done: please make your requested changes to the module's sandbox first; see WP:TESTCASES. — {{U|Technical 13}} (e • t • c)15:55, 2 March 2015 (UTC)- I did. Please check Module:WikidataCheck/sandbox. mw.wikibase.getEntity() will be changed in a not backwards compatible way in two weeks, so it would be great to implement the changes before that. --Lucie Kaffee (WMDE) (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Done. Also Lucie Kaffee (WMDE), if you make 1 more edit anywhere on en.wiki you'll be able to edit semi-protected pages. Stickee (talk) 00:26, 25 March 2015 (UTC)
- I did. Please check Module:WikidataCheck/sandbox. mw.wikibase.getEntity() will be changed in a not backwards compatible way in two weeks, so it would be great to implement the changes before that. --Lucie Kaffee (WMDE) (talk) 15:06, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Tracking categories
| Local param | Wikidata property | Tracking cat |
|---|---|---|
| exists | missing | Not in Wikidata |
| missing | exists | Different |
| exists | exists and different | Different |
| exists | exists and same | Same |
...but row #2 is not (necessarily?) right: missing local param is a normal thing, this means that the value has been migrated to Wikidata, and no human review is needed (unlike row #3). If, on the other hand, one attempts to work around this by falling back to Wikidata property if local param is missing - like MusicBrainz templates do - then #2 becomes #4, which is again not right - the values are not really the "same", there is e.g. no need to delete the local param as redundant. I'd argue that in case #2 no tracking needs to be done. I believe this would make sense both for MusicBrainz and {{Official website}} (I'd like to use WikidataCheck in the latter). GregorB (talk) 11:59, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
- Ping @Happy5214: any opinion on the above? GregorB (talk) 15:32, 15 April 2015 (UTC)