Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Behavioral Description Language

Behavioral Description Language

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails General Notability Guideline, WP:NSOFT. Unable to find any sources that weren't self-published. Orphan for 4.5 years. Note: there is also a redir at BDL (Behavioral Description Language) ― Padenton|✉ 08:46, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep behavioral description language as an article on the generic concept. No opinion on Behavioral Description Language as NEC's in-house version of it.

I'm also concerned that this is yet another bulk nomination (of very many) from the same nominator, all with the same blanket "Just not notable" rationale and no evidence of any effort at WP:BEFORE. Behavioral description language is a big topic with a vast range of sources (even if WP hasn't got there yet). Given the close naming overlap between the two articles, it's implausible that Behavioral Description Language can be nominated as "Unable to find any sources" without having first had to wade through a great many on the generic topic. This is a complex question for notability and requires per-source judgement, not simply a "just not notable". Andy Dingley (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Andy Dingley: No, sadly, I actually wasted a good bit of time looking up every single one of these. Perhaps you should skip to policy-based arguments rather than ad hominem and hatchet jobs. ― Padenton|✉ 13:26, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]