Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Textbase

Textbase

Textbase (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that this meets WP:NOTABILITY. Has been tagged for notability for 7 years unresolved. Boleyn (talk) 19:42, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

• Delete-per nom. Wgolf (talk) 20:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
• Delete, the reference from Armand might be substantial, but given that there's not much else on this group apart from blog reviews and the like, I'm not at all convinced. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC).

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:42, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:43, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

• Delete Article sourced to a review site. Does not pass notability. AlbinoFerret 20:17, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
• Delete – Source searches are not providing sources to qualify an article for this topic, relative to WP:N. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 18:56, 6 April 2015 (UTC)