Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exploding hamster
By its own admission, this topic is obscure. Simply put: no way is "an obscure in-joke in the early years of [a] Finnish computer magazine" notable. Not in the least. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. (The only reason this article exists is for silly parallelism with exploding whale and exploding toad.) zafiroblue05 | Talk 01:14, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- DELETE
Cmon now...an exploding hamster? Get that outta here...Reppin the bay 01:54, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Nom. --Shane (talk/contrib) 01:59, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Weak Keep. After all, detailed obscure topics hurt no one. It is a valid topic. -- Chris Ccool2ax contrib. 02:07, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep per Chris —— Eagle (ask me for help) 02:11, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge to MikroBitti as that is the most approprate place for this. Crazynas t 02:25, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Keep Per Chris, also pls define where it falls under WP:NOT I can't really understand where you're coming from, because as far as I can see it doesn't fit under any of the "wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information" catergories! -- Librarianofages 02:43, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete the Exploding hamster and Exploding head and Exploding sheep. The rest of the exploding items are legit articles. WP is not an indiscriminate collection of in-jokes about computer gaming works for me. -- MrDolomite | Talk 03:51, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I never heard of a hampster exploding because it was released from scotch tape, but at the Columbus, Ohio zoo I once saw an elephant blow snot out of its trunk while its handler was unchaining it. I hope that helps. george 06:02, 24 July 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Not a place for obscure finnish jokes JeffMurph 08:10, 24 July 2006 (UTC)